<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Haugerns Development Escapades &#187; ncover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.haugern.net/blog/category/ncover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.haugern.net/blog</link>
	<description>Morten Haug on development and other curiosities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 21:56:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Remember to check out PartCover</title>
		<link>http://www.haugern.net/blog/remember-to-check-out-partcover/</link>
		<comments>http://www.haugern.net/blog/remember-to-check-out-partcover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 20:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>haugern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[code coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dotnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ncover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.haugern.net/blog/remember-to-check-out-partcover/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bil Simser just wrote about the lack of coverage tools for .NET in this article, and I agree with his points.
In our current project we&#8217;re using NCover and NCoverExplorer (older editions), which are working just fine as we&#8217;re still in the .NET 2.0 world. It seems there are some problems with the older versions (they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bil Simser just wrote about <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/bsimser/archive/2008/01/29/lack-of-coverage-tools-for-net.aspx" target="_blank">the lack of coverage tools for .NET in this article</a>, and I agree with his points.</p>
<p>In our current project we&#8217;re using <a href="http://www.ncover.com/" target="_blank">NCover and NCoverExplorer</a> (<a href="http://www.ncover.com/download/discontinued" target="_blank">older editions</a>), which are working just fine as we&#8217;re still in the .NET 2.0 world. It seems there are some problems with the older versions (they have gone commercial on us) and the new .NET 3.5 framework.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t particularly good news, as we&#8217;re going to utilize VS 2008 and .NET 3.5 shortly. The choice is wether fleshing out 150 USD, or find an alternative. One of the comments on Bils post linked to another coverage utility; <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/partcover" target="_blank">PartCover</a>.</p>
<p>So, note to self: <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/partcover" target="_blank">Check out PartCover when</a> we&#8217;re going .NET 3.5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.haugern.net/blog/remember-to-check-out-partcover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
